Mistaken View
Right Siding in a bridge game.
I came across a interesting but fallacious bridge argument recently. See if you can detect the mistake.
You and your partner are silent and the opposition, at teams, bid 1
, 1
, 2NT, 3NT and miss an easy 6 diamond contract.
The 2NT bidder has:
4 2
A Q
A K 9 2
K Q 8 7 2
In the discussion that followed, the justification for bidding 2NT was "to right side the contract and protect the heart 'ten-ace' of Ace and Queen".
Of course if the 2NT bidder had reversed into 2
, partners likely bids would have been 2
(fourth suit forcing) without a heart stop and 2NT or 3NT with a heart stop. In either case there is no need to protect the
AQ by bidding 2NT after 1 spade.
In practice the partner of the 2NT bidder had 4 diamonds including the Queen, the black Aces and the heart King and we gained 13 imps on the hand. His riposte to his partner was "2NT denied 4 diamonds - let alone 4 good diamonds - so there was no chance of a diamond slam on your bidding.
Also what the 2NT bidder would not see was that the failure to reverse into diamonds guarantees at least 5 cards in the major suits as well as risking missing a club or diamond contract.
Enjoy your bridge.
R. Wells
Simple Tips with Big Impact
![]()
Have your say...
Be the first to leave your comment.
Green Issues With Michael Wale

Apple Lovers
Michael Wale visits a Herefordshire orchard brought back to life by the public.
Spotlight
Meet 50connect's Columnists
From relationship advice to environmental issues; life as an ex-pat living in France and the highs and lows of going back to study; read the latest from our regular contributors.


Bookmark with:
Don’t know what this is?
Read the 50connect Guide To Social Bookmarking.