The investment world and arena changes like the sands. If you aren’t with it, the potential impact on return for you as a pension or ISA investor can be quite extraordinary.
Sticking to old strategies in a new world reminds me of my 1992 flight with Monarch airlines to Egypt.
A woman sat beside me, nervous from flying, smoked incessantly from beginning to end.
Now, Monarch doesn’t exist, smoking on planes is banned and let’s not talk about risks of flying v lighting match on a plane, and smoking on your health.
Understanding your pension fund
Many of you have a pension fund tucked away in an old sock or cupboard somewhere, unaware of how it is being managed and potentially of the belief that all investment is the same. Perhaps you have a pension fund you check regularly but haven’t compared how it could be being managed elsewhere.
I’ve previously covered how the best managed pension fund performed against the worst over a twenty year period.
£100,000 invested became £94,640 in one well-known pension fund meanwhile the top performer hit a staggering £1 Million.
Trust me, pension funds as well as ISA’s are invested very differently and the results are very different.
World markets are changing and the old 60/40 rules change with it. What do I mean by 60/40?
It used to be that investors put 60% in equities (stocks and shares), which is where they hoped for growth. Bonds made up the remaining 40% and they were held for three reasons:
First they were a negative correlation to equities – It’s like investing into an ice cream company and a welly boot company. In normal conditions they both do fine, but when markets surprise one way, you have a payout from the good weather (ice cream) to compensate on the losses in the welly boot company.
That is what we mean by negative correlation, which smooths out returns when balanced against equities.
The two other reasons are a predictable income; and the potential for a Capital Gain.
Many of the stocks and bonds suffered in extreme conditions over the last 24 months and there was actually nowhere to hide i.e. no negative correlation.
The investment market has had its axis tilted and so fund managers have had to look elsewhere for a negative correlation.
But what about bonds and inflation for the coming years?
I’ve covered inflation over the last few months and it’s on a knife edge. Let me explain some issues with it for you to consider on the negative side.
We can easily think everything is always going to be the same but if we look at bonds over certain periods of pressure, it wasn’t so pretty. Bond prices respond the opposite to inflation.
Some may not remember 1972 to 1974 where UK bonds lost half their inflation adjusted value. Yes, a supposed safe haven lost half its inflation adjusted value. From 1900 to 1981 real returns were actually negative. Wars don’t help.
The last 40 years have seen unprecedented returns, but history is likely to show that is now gone.
Your biggest bond risk is inflation naturally. There are debt headwinds that will stop people spending. Public debt is also a weight as that affects the UK Government’s ability to pay it as interest rates rise.
However, in the US, Jay Powell has made it clear he wants full employment and will peg interest rates just under inflation.
You might see where this is going. Normal interest rate policy allows policy to think further ahead and in a more stringent manner, but this policy carries its risk, a risk of runaway inflation, which pops the airbag. Airbags are not easy to push back in, and so US treasury investors have taken a whack of -15% in value in three months with the belief that inflation is coming back.
So what am I saying? Appoint the very best fund managers. Don’t expect every manager to be right up to date and don’t expect that all previous models will always work.Last modified: June 10, 2021